Research

How is your community navigating the national divide?

Local government remains a haven for cooperation – but the pressures are real.

“As much as local governments intend to be apolitical, the impact of the national divide is now hitting home locally.”

ICMA PM Magazine / Polco Research

The Trust Paradox

Here’s the paradox: Americans trust local government far more than federal government – 67% versus under 20%. Yet local leaders increasingly feel the spillover effects of national polarization in their daily work. Council relationships, public meetings, and stakeholder expectations all operate differently than they did five years ago.

This creates a Face the Truth challenge – not because local government is broken, but because the environment around it has shifted. The playbook that worked in 2019 doesn’t account for the new pressures local leaders navigate today.

Local government leaders are navigating this better than most realize. A 2024 Carnegie/CivicPulse survey found that while 87% of local officials believe polarization is hurting the country, only 31% see significant negative effects in their own communities. Smaller communities under 50,000 are especially resilient.

70%

of local government officials say political division negatively impacts their organization

The impact shows up in resident engagement, council interactions, and day-to-day operations.

Source: Polco/ICMA Survey

73%

say declining trust is the most-felt consequence of polarization

Local trust started declining around 2021-2022, after decades of relative stability.

Source: Polco/ICMA Survey

Misinformation has become operational

Almost 80% of local government professionals say misinformation has negatively affected their organization. The decline in local journalism – over 2,500 news outlets have closed since 2005 – means more residents get information about local issues from national sources or social media, both of which tend toward sensationalism. Source: ICMA

Why This Matters

Local government is where democracy actually works. It’s where people interact with their government directly, where services get delivered, where problems get solved. When national polarization spills into local governance, it doesn’t just make meetings harder – it threatens the one level of government most Americans still trust.

The research suggests two things simultaneously: local government is more resilient than headlines suggest, AND the pressures are real and increasing. Leaders who navigate this well aren’t the ones who avoid controversy. They’re the ones who’ve built environments where disagreement can happen productively – where people can work together despite different political identities.

This is why The Shift That Sticks methodology emphasizes seeing reality clearly before trying to change it. The political environment has shifted. Acknowledging that – without catastrophizing it – is the first step toward adapting effectively.

One conversation to try this week: Ask a colleague, “What’s one way the political environment has changed how we do our work?” Then listen without defending the old approach. The answer tells you something about what your team is actually navigating.

Coming Soon

The Shift Assessment

A 10-minute diagnostic that measures where your organization stands across the four practices – and where to focus next.

We’re looking for practitioners to beta test and help shape the final version.

More on Leadership & Governance

How leaders build trust in challenging environments.

More articles coming soon. Browse all insights

Understanding the broader challenge facing leaders today