Research
How is your community navigating the national divide?
Local government remains a haven for cooperation – but the pressures are real.
“As much as local governments intend to be apolitical, the impact of the national divide is now hitting home locally.”
The Trust Paradox
Here’s the paradox: Americans trust local government far more than federal government – 67% versus under 20%. Yet local leaders increasingly feel the spillover effects of national polarization in their daily work. Council relationships, public meetings, and stakeholder expectations all operate differently than they did five years ago.
This creates a Face the Truth challenge – not because local government is broken, but because the environment around it has shifted. The playbook that worked in 2019 doesn’t account for the new pressures local leaders navigate today.
Local government leaders are navigating this better than most realize. A 2024 Carnegie/CivicPulse survey found that while 87% of local officials believe polarization is hurting the country, only 31% see significant negative effects in their own communities. Smaller communities under 50,000 are especially resilient.
70%
of local government officials say political division negatively impacts their organization
The impact shows up in resident engagement, council interactions, and day-to-day operations.
73%
say declining trust is the most-felt consequence of polarization
Local trust started declining around 2021-2022, after decades of relative stability.
Misinformation has become operational
Almost 80% of local government professionals say misinformation has negatively affected their organization. The decline in local journalism – over 2,500 news outlets have closed since 2005 – means more residents get information about local issues from national sources or social media, both of which tend toward sensationalism. Source: ICMA
Why This Matters
Local government is where democracy actually works. It’s where people interact with their government directly, where services get delivered, where problems get solved. When national polarization spills into local governance, it doesn’t just make meetings harder – it threatens the one level of government most Americans still trust.
The research suggests two things simultaneously: local government is more resilient than headlines suggest, AND the pressures are real and increasing. Leaders who navigate this well aren’t the ones who avoid controversy. They’re the ones who’ve built environments where disagreement can happen productively – where people can work together despite different political identities.
This is why The Shift That Sticks methodology emphasizes seeing reality clearly before trying to change it. The political environment has shifted. Acknowledging that – without catastrophizing it – is the first step toward adapting effectively.
One conversation to try this week: Ask a colleague, “What’s one way the political environment has changed how we do our work?” Then listen without defending the old approach. The answer tells you something about what your team is actually navigating.
Coming Soon
The Shift Assessment
A 10-minute diagnostic that measures where your organization stands across the four practices – and where to focus next.
We’re looking for practitioners to beta test and help shape the final version.
More on Leadership & Governance
How leaders build trust in challenging environments.
-
When Clarity Fades: What Happens to Trust in Local Government
Gallup research shows only 22% of employees strongly agree their organization’s leadership has a clear direction. For local government leaders,…
-
Navigating the First 90 Days as a New City Manager
Stepping into a new city manager role presents unique challenges. These Think Tank insights offer guidance for the first 90…
-
Leadership Excellence in Local Government
City managers and county administrators stand at the nexus between visionary change and public service values. This guide explores leadership…
More articles coming soon. Browse all insights