Time in the seat, and the conditions beside it

5.4 yearsmedian time local government employees had been with their current employer in January 2026, the first reading under a revised count
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, January 2026
46810 years2004201620268.35.4 in 202646810 years2004201620268.35.4 in 202646810 years2004201620268.35.4 in 2026

The 2026 reading is counted a new way, so it is not joined to the line.

How it moved, and the figures behind the chart

It was 8.3 years in January 2016 and 6.4 in January 2024 on the earlier industry classification; the January 2026 reading of 5.4 is on a new classification the Bureau calls not strictly comparable. Private industry: 3.9 years in 2026.

Median years with current employer, wage and salary workers 16 and over, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

JanuaryLocal governmentPrivate industry
20046.43.5
20066.63.6
20087.13.6
20107.54.0
20128.14.2
20147.94.1
20168.33.7
20186.93.8
20206.63.7
20226.93.7
20246.43.5
20265.43.9
5.4 yearsmedian time local government employees had worked for their current employer in January 2026, on a new classification

Shorter time with one employer is not lower capability. The figure says nothing about skill, performance or readiness. The panels below are the conditions beside it, each a national series against its private-sector or all-employed comparison.

Tenure in state, federal and private employment, and the classification change

The median local government employee had worked for their current employer for 8.3 years in January 2016 and 6.4 years in January 2024, on the earlier industry classification. In January 2026 the median was 5.4 years under the new classification, which the Bureau says is not strictly comparable with earlier years. The figure covers every local government employee, schools included. In the same month the median was 5.4 years in state government, 7.0 years in the federal government and 3.9 years in private industry (Bureau of Labor Statistics).

44.3median age of people working in public administration in 2025
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2025
35404550 years20112018202544.3 in 202535404550 years20112018202544.3 in 202535404550 years20112018202544.3 in 2025
How it moved, and the figures behind the chart

It was 45.7 in 2015 and 45.8 in 2019. All employed: 42.3 in 2015 and 2019, 42.1 in 2025.

Median age of employed persons, years, annual averages; 2025 is an eleven-month average

YearPublic administrationAll employed
201144.942.1
201245.342.3
201345.642.4
201445.542.3
201545.742.3
201645.642.2
201745.642.2
201845.442.2
201945.842.3
202045.642.5
202145.842.2
202245.642.3
202345.142.1
202444.942.2
202544.342.1
33%growth in state and local government wages from late 2016 to late 2025, against 38% for private wages
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Fourth quarter of 2025
010203040%201620212025private wagesstate and local government wages38%33% in 2025010203040%201620212025private wagesstate and local government wages38%33% in 2025010203040%201620212025private wagesstate and local government wages38%33% in 2025
How it moved, and the figures behind the chartSource: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Cost Index

Both indexes stood at 100 in December 2005. After inflation, state and local wages in late 2025 sat about 2% below their 2019 level, and private wages about 1% above.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Employment Cost Index, wages and salaries, all workers, not seasonally adjusted, December 2005 = 100

Fourth quarterState and localPrivate
2005100.0100.0
2006103.5103.2
2007107.1106.6
2008110.4109.4
2009112.5110.8
2010113.8112.8
2011114.9114.6
2012116.2116.6
2013117.5119.0
2014119.4121.6
2015121.6124.2
2016124.1127.1
2017126.7130.6
2018129.7134.7
2019133.0138.7
2020135.4142.6
2021139.0149.7
2022145.6157.4
2023152.4164.1
2024159.2170.2
2025164.5175.9

Consumer prices, the measure behind “after inflation” in the wage figures above

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, August 2026
150200250300350 Index200020132026334.98 in 2026150200250300350 Index200020132026334.98 in 2026150200250300350 Index200020132026334.98 in 2026

1982 to 1984 = 100, not seasonally adjusted. U.S. city average is the national average across urban areas.

The figures behind the chart

Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, all items, U.S. city average, monthly, January 2000 to August 2026, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

PeriodIndex
2000-12174.000
2001-12176.700
2002-12180.900
2003-12184.300
2004-12190.300
2005-12196.800
2006-12201.800
2007-12210.036
2008-12210.228
2009-12215.949
2010-12219.179
2011-12225.672
2012-12229.601
2013-12233.049
2014-12234.812
2015-12236.525
2016-12241.432
2017-12246.524
2018-12251.233
2019-12256.974
2020-12260.474
2021-12278.802
2022-12296.797
2023-12306.746
2024-12315.605
2025-12324.054
2026-08334.980
0.8%of state and local government employees outside education quit in an average month of 2025
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2025
0246810%200120132025Job openings rate, state and local government excluding educationQuits rate, state and local government excluding education4.2%0.8% in 20250246810%200120132025Job openings rate, state and local government excluding educationQuits rate, state and local government excluding education4.2%0.8% in 20250246810%200120132025Job openings rate, state and local government excluding educationQuits rate, state and local government excluding education4.2%0.8% in 2025
How it moved, and the figures behind the chartSource: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, JOLTS

The same rate as in 2015 and 2019, after a peak of 1.1% in 2022. Job openings: 4.2% in 2025 against 2.9% in 2015. Private industry quits ran at 2.2% in 2025, a level from the annual table.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Percent of employment a month, annual average of monthly rates, state and local government excluding education

YearQuitsOpenings
20010.8%3.0%
20020.7%2.8%
20030.7%2.2%
20040.7%2.2%
20050.7%2.3%
20060.8%2.7%
20070.7%2.8%
20080.7%2.5%
20090.5%1.9%
20100.5%1.8%
20110.6%2.0%
20120.6%2.2%
20130.6%2.4%
20140.8%2.7%
20150.8%2.9%
20160.9%2.9%
20170.8%3.1%
20180.8%3.5%
20190.8%3.9%
20200.8%4.0%
20211.0%5.0%
20221.1%6.0%
20230.9%5.7%
20240.9%5.1%
20250.8%4.2%
38.5%of state and local employers’ cost per hour worked was benefits in March 2026, against 30.1% for private employers
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2026
010203040%200420152026state and local employersfor private employers38.5% in 202630.1%010203040%200420152026state and local employersfor private employers38.5% in 202630.1%010203040%200420152026state and local employersfor private employers38.5% in 202630.1%
How it moved, and the figures behind the chartSource: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employer Costs for Employee Compensation

36.4% against 30.3% in March 2016. Levels with their years; no trend is claimed.

Benefits as a percent of total compensation per hour worked, levels only

QuarterState and localPrivate
First quarter of 201636.4%30.3%
First quarter of 202638.5%30.1%

What the wage and separation figures do and do not say

Wages are a condition beside the shorter tenure, not a measured cause of it. The benefits share is what governments spend on health care and retirement; it is not a judgment on the people who receive it. Advocacy groups on each side read these wages differently. The Economic Policy Institute, which is labor-aligned, finds state and local workers’ wages and total compensation below those of similarly educated private workers. The American Enterprise Institute, which is right-of-center, found state workers’ wages below those of similar private workers from 2009 to 2012 and their total compensation, with pensions and retiree health, above; it says its findings should not be extended to local government employees. This page takes no position on the level of total compensation.

Other separations, which include retirement, transfer, death and disability, ran between 0.2% and 0.3% of employment a month in every year from 2001 to 2025. Both rates are published to one decimal, which hides small moves, and retirements are not counted on their own. Two other readings sit beside the quits line. In late 2025, 51% of U.S. employees across all employers were looking for or watching for a new job (Gallup); looking and leaving are different measures, and that series is charted on the Workforce Expectations page.

Retirement and succession

40%of state and local human resources leaders said in 2026 that their largest retirement wave was behind them or never came
Source: MissionSquare Research Institute, 2026
2026retirement wave has already taken place20%no significant wave of retirements20%wave taking place now15%wave in the next few years44%40% in 20262026retirement wave has alreadytaken place20%no significant wave ofretirements20%wave taking place now15%wave in the next few years44%40% in 20262026retirement wave hasalready taken place20%no significant wave ofretirements20%wave taking place now15%wave in the next fewyears44%40% in 2026
How it moved, and the figures behind the chart
retirement wave has already taken placeno significant wave of retirementswave taking place nowwave in the next few years
Source: MissionSquare Research Institute, 2026

It was 25% in 2021, and higher in each year between. In 2026, 15% said the wave was happening now and 44% still expected it ahead. The publisher rounds each share, so the four responses in the table do not always sum to 100.

Percent of state and local human resources respondents, the four published responses as rounded by the publisher, MissionSquare Research Institute

YearAlready taken placeNo significant waveTaking place nowIn the next few years
202116%9%19%57%
202214%17%24%45%
202315%17%16%53%
202416%21%9%54%
202518%21%15%46%
202620%20%15%44%
retirement wave has already takenplace0204060%20%20212026no significant wave of retirements20%20212026wave taking place now15%20212026wave in the next few years44%20212026retirement wave hasalready taken place0204060%20%20212026no significant wave ofretirements20%20212026wave taking place now0204060%15%20212026wave in the next fewyears44%20212026retirement wave has already taken place0204060%20%20212026no significant wave of retirements0204060%20%20212026wave taking place now0204060%15%20212026wave in the next few years0204060%44%20212026
For the people a leader leads

Where long-serving colleagues have retired, the people who stepped in may not yet have had the chance to learn all that those colleagues knew.

In 2026, 51% of state and local human resources leaders called succession planning very important, and 53% reported no formal succession planning process (MissionSquare Research Institute). The survey changed its question in 2025, so those are levels with their year and no trend is drawn from earlier years.

Who the survey reached, and who published it

The survey reached 606 human resources leaders, 77% of them in local government, and is not weighted. Its publisher, MissionSquare Research Institute, is the research arm of a retirement-plan provider to public employers, and ran the survey with the Public Sector HR Association and the National Association of State Personnel Executives. Its size rests on this survey alone.

Three questions only the organization can answer

No national series measures any one city or county. These three questions are for a leadership team to answer about its own.

  1. Which roles would be hardest to fill next year, and who is being prepared for each one now?
  2. When a long-serving colleague leaves, how does what they know reach the person who steps in?
  3. What does the organization’s succession process look like in practice, and when did the leadership team last put it to work?

Two pages on what leaders and staff build from conditions like these.